(video) Feb 4, 2012,
Mohammad Shafia understood Islam very well
— Mass "honor killing" (i.e. DIShonor murders) to Q5:48 'DIVINE' Sharia 'law' o2.4 (o1.1-2)Usama Dakdok, (video, start) "… without 'honor killing' — Islam will not exists" 
1:20 Min "… Muhammad was 51 year old when he married Aisha, 6 years … Muhammad IS a child molester(Q65:4) … his ACTION gives him this title"
UPDATE: Snuffed out
Pamela Geller About
Email me
"Evil is made possible by the sanction you give it. Withdraw your sanction"
leaveislamsafely.com
youtube
Media Player Error
Update your browser or Flash plugin
Update your browser or Flash plugin
Sheik Yer'mami
Video: Michael Coren on Fox speaks out on honor killing: "this was something intrinsic to Islam"
Feb 3, 2012 "This had nothing to do with domestic violence and everything to do with honour killings" (Toronto Sun)
…Mokdad's mother told police that Alfetlawi felt so shamed by her daughter’s Western ways, he killed her in an honor killing, Warren Police Sgt. Stephen Mills said….
Feb 4, 2012 Imam to issue Fatwa to condemn ‘honour killings’ (Toronto Sun)
…“There is no such thing in Islam that if somebody is bringing disgrace to your family’s honour that you go out and kill that person,”
said (taqiyyah 3:28, 16:106 visage) Imam Syed Soharwardy, founder of Islamic Supreme Council of Canada (German counterpart Aiman Mazyek, or Ibrahim Siddiq-Conlon from Australia)
“There is no usage of Islam to justify their crimes,…”
he said, adding he doesn’t think Mohammad Shafia understood Islam very well….
Vs.
click to zoom ¬
Feb 3, 2012 Pamela Geller ...*Above scan is from these pages from one of the most important English-language sources for the content of Islamic law: Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law: It is certified by Al-Azhar University as a translation that "corresponds to the Arabic original and conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni Community...":
In Book O, titled "Justice," in section 1, "Who is Subject to Retaliation for Injurious Crimes," section o1.1 reads, "Retaliation is obligatory ... against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right..."
However, o1.2 clarifies (above) that "The following are not subject to retaliation" and then lists — after the lovely, egalitarian "Muslim for killing a non-Muslim" (9:5) and "Jewish or Christian subject (9:29) ... for killing an apostate" (4:89) — "(4) a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring."
Feb 1, 2012 Canadian confusion over honor killings ...Almost as soon as the sentence was announced apologists for Islam claimed that the murders had nothing to do with Islam and that honour killings don't exist in the Islamic community. This is complete and total nonsense. The murders had everything to do with Islam and its teaching towards women (read the Koran yourself if you doubt it, specifically 4:34, 2:228, 33:59, 33:33, 2:223, 66:5, 4:11, 2:282:, 5.6, 24:31, 4:3, 53:27, 4:24, 33:50, 38:44, hell, read the whole thing) and honour killings have been a staple of Islamic life from the very beginning and are a large, well-documented and growing....
...Perhaps the Shafia case will serve to wake Canadians up to Islam's true nature....
Robert Spencer Director of Jihad Watch
